Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
158-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

158-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.003452 50.851884)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.003396 50.851878,-1.003398 50.851889,-1.003406 50.851899,-1.003419 50.851908,-1.003434 50.851913,-1.003452 50.851915,-1.003469 50.851913,-1.003485 50.851908,-1.003498 50.851900,-1.003506 50.851890,-1.003509 50.851879,-1.003507 50.851868,-1.003499 50.851858,-1.003487 50.851850,-1.003471 50.851845,-1.003453 50.851843,-1.003436 50.851844,-1.003420 50.851849,-1.003407 50.851857,-1.003399 50.851867,-1.003396 50.851878)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL